commit e3924dfef7095465a9c35d939552b7a11008434e
parent 8f29dcceff9770bc808ea0de26a3c75286598266
Author: ugrnm <ultrageranium@bleu255.com>
Date: Wed Jan 15 22:28:35 +0100
typo again again
Diffstat:2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/on-not-scaling-lurk/index.html b/on-not-scaling-lurk/index.html
@@ -350,10 +350,10 @@ governance</title>
<p>Concerning financial sustainability, one of the ways we have been
receiving (and gladly accepting) a tremendous amount of support is
in terms of donations. We started an <a
- href="opencollective.com/lurk">Open Collective</a> in 2021 and have
- been amazed at how people have chipped in. Because we are small,
- frugal, anti-cloud and get some of our infrastructure sponsored<a
- href="#fn8" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref8"
+ href="https://opencollective.com/lurk">Open Collective</a> in 2021
+ and have been amazed at how people have chipped in. Because we are
+ small, frugal, anti-cloud and get some of our infrastructure
+ sponsored<a href="#fn8" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref8"
role="doc-noteref"><sup>8</sup></a>, we have historically spent very
little costs regarding infrastructure. The reason we started
collecting donations was to see if we could compensate for
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ governance</title>
to let us know that computational resources needed for maintaining a
cache are minimal compared to the resources needed to process data:
you’re missing the point and the bigger systemic issues at stake,
- here’s a little ASCII heart fo your effort tho <3<a
+ here’s a little ASCII heart for your effort tho <3<a
href="#fnref14" class="footnote-back"
role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
</ol>
diff --git a/on-not-scaling-lurk/on-not-scaling-lurk.md b/on-not-scaling-lurk/on-not-scaling-lurk.md
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Surely, there is an alternative timeline where LURK is run as a super structured
-Concerning financial sustainability, one of the ways we have been receiving (and gladly accepting) a tremendous amount of support is in terms of donations. We started an [Open Collective](opencollective.com/lurk) in 2021 and have been amazed at how people have chipped in. Because we are small, frugal, anti-cloud and get some of our infrastructure sponsored[^sponsored], we have historically spent very little costs regarding infrastructure. The reason we started collecting donations was to see if we could compensate for maintenance labour instead, and hopefully demonstrate the value of such a tactic at a time when Big Tech and a misunderstanding of open forms of software production have led us to believe that the digital commons and digital solidarity are a thing falling from the sky. This is
+Concerning financial sustainability, one of the ways we have been receiving (and gladly accepting) a tremendous amount of support is in terms of donations. We started an [Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/lurk) in 2021 and have been amazed at how people have chipped in. Because we are small, frugal, anti-cloud and get some of our infrastructure sponsored[^sponsored], we have historically spent very little costs regarding infrastructure. The reason we started collecting donations was to see if we could compensate for maintenance labour instead, and hopefully demonstrate the value of such a tactic at a time when Big Tech and a misunderstanding of open forms of software production have led us to believe that the digital commons and digital solidarity are a thing falling from the sky. This is
even crucial for us, as, like discussed earlier, we are often helping other cultural workers to run things themselves and pretending that the economic dimension does not exist is incredibly dishonest. (Post-)Free culture evangelism has to stop sounding like an obscure hypocritical pyramid scheme with only the most privileged persons being the ones who are able to play the game. To our surprise, soliciting donations has worked so far, and we have been using the majority of donations to compensate for sysadmin and moderation labour
of the team. We believe we are one of the few instances where donated funds are used primarily to pay people, rather than cloud companies. Really.
@@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ Alex, Aymeric, Brendan, Lídia, Roel
[^fediwhat]: Mansoux, A., & Roscam Abbing, R. (2020). *Seven Theses on the Fediverse and the Becoming of FLOSS*. In The Eternal Network : The Ends and Becomings of Network Culture (pp. 124–140). [https://monoskop.org/images/c/cc/Mansoux-Aymeric-Abbing-Roel-Roscam-2020-Seven-Theses-on-the-Fediverse-and-the-Becoming-of-FLOSS.pdf](https://monoskop.org/images/c/cc/Mansoux_Aymeric_Abbing_Roel_Roscam_2020_Seven_Theses_on_the_Fediverse_and_the_Becoming_of_FLOSS.pdf)
[^jenga]: See the Jenga Computing entry of rosa’s Ecofeminist Dictionary. De Valk, M. (2023). *rosa's Ecofeminist Dictionary (rED)*. In Sun Thinking. Solar Protocol. <https://solarprotocol.net/sunthinking/devalk.html#jenga-computing>
[^comsrv]: See <https://monoskop.org/Community_servers>.
-[^reply]: greetings to all the reply guys who are now dying to let us know that computational resources needed for maintaining a cache are minimal compared to the resources needed to process data: you're missing the point and the bigger systemic issues at stake, here's a little ASCII heart fo your effort tho <3
+[^reply]: greetings to all the reply guys who are now dying to let us know that computational resources needed for maintaining a cache are minimal compared to the resources needed to process data: you're missing the point and the bigger systemic issues at stake, here's a little ASCII heart for your effort tho <3
